Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes
Date: 2010-03-22 15:01:44
Message-ID: 1269270104.8481.675.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 16:40 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On mån, 2010-03-22 at 13:15 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > * inet datatypes don't have a commutative operator on which a unique
> > index can be built. There is no "overlaps" equivalent, which again is a
> > shame because that stops them being used with the new feature.
>
> http://pgfoundry.org/projects/ip4r/ provides an overlap operator.

Like I said, nothing in the base server.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-03-22 15:02:13 Re: Proposal: access control jails (and introduction as aspiring GSoC student)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-03-22 14:46:46 Re: 9.0 release notes done