Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL
Date: 2010-02-03 17:10:11
Message-ID: 1265217011.1729.2407.camel@ebony (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 11:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> I've concluded that that's too large a change to undertake for 9.0

The purpose of this was to make the big changes in 9.0. If we aren't
going to do that it seems like we shouldn't bother at all.

So why not flip back to the easier approach of make something work for
HS only and then do everything you want to do in the next release? The
burst radius of the half-way changes you are proposing seems high in
comparison.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alex HunsakerDate: 2010-02-03 17:18:51
Subject: Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-02-03 17:07:09
Subject: Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group