Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plpython3

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, James William Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpython3
Date: 2010-02-01 21:39:12
Message-ID: 1265060352.10100.189.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 16:31 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>  
> > > I would love to know why PL/Python can't be incrementally improved like
> > > the rest of our code.
> > 
> > It has been. That is exactly what PeterE has been doing.
> > 
> > However, if you look at this whole thread, you will see the James has a
> > very different view of the implementation. One that at least appears to
> > be more advanced and "pythonic" than our version.
> 
> More "pythonic" in its internal processing or in its user interface?

User interface and also internal processing (see the types discussion).

Joshua D. Drake




-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-02-01 21:43:56
Subject: Re: plpython3
Previous:From: James William PyeDate: 2010-02-01 21:38:48
Subject: Re: plpython3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group