Re: Hot Standby and deadlock detection

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: Hot Standby and deadlock detection
Date: 2010-02-01 17:05:19
Message-ID: 1265043919.13782.12556.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 17:50 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> Umm, so why not run the deadlock check immediately in
> max_standby_delay=-1 case as well? Why is that case handled differently
> from max_standby_delay>0 case?

Done, tested, working.

Will commit tomorrow if no further questions or comments.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
startup_deadlock_check.v2.patch text/x-patch 10.5 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-02-01 17:12:09 Re: pgsql: Augment EXPLAIN output with more details on Hash nodes.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-02-01 17:01:55 Re: pgsql: Augment EXPLAIN output with more details on Hash nodes.