Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
Date: 2011-05-30 18:39:37
Message-ID: 12648.1306780777@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 00:21, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:39, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> I wouldn't have a problem with making the Windows port throw an error
>>>> for "local" lines. We'd have to fix initdb to remove that line from the
>>>> sample file (if it doesn't already), but that's surely not hard.

> Here's a patch that I think does what we want. It works fine on
> Windows - I just want to make sure this is what you meant as well?

Looks sane to me.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2011-05-30 18:40:00
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-05-30 18:26:00
Subject: Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group