On tor, 2010-01-21 at 15:47 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > Here is a small patch that changes the error message
> > duplicate key value violates unique constraint "%s"
> > into
> > duplicate key value violates primary key "%s"
> > when the constraint is in fact a primary key.
> > Comments?
> Why bother?
Because unique constraints and primary keys are different things and it
would be slightly less confusing that way.
> And why bother now, when we're in the middle of the last
> CommitFest and trying to move toward a release?
Are you saying we can't discuss anything new during the commit fest?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-21 21:29:12|
|Subject: Re: primary key error message |
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2010-01-21 21:22:30|
|Subject: Re: primary key error message|