Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay
Date: 2010-01-17 21:51:17
Message-ID: 1263765077.3642.223.camel@ebony (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 22:57 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> 
> > It would be good if there was a keepalive WAL record with a
> timestamp on it generated every N seconds while in streaming mode.
> 
> Yeah, that would help. In streaming replication we could also send
> such timestamp as a separate message, not within WAL.

Is that something you're working on?

Do we need a new record type for that, is there a handy record type to
bounce from?

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-01-17 21:53:47
Subject: Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-17 21:42:39
Subject: Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group