Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SE-PgSQL patch review

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SE-PgSQL patch review
Date: 2009-12-01 19:27:06
Message-ID: 1259695626.26322.55.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 20:28 -0800, David Fetter wrote:

> This is totally separate from the really important question of whether
> SE-Linux has a future, and another about whether, if SE-Linux has a
> future, PostgreSQL needs to go there.

Why would we think that it doesn't? Maybe I haven't been following as
much as I should but as I understand it, SE-Linux is pretty much the
defacto policy framework for Linux. Has that changed?

Joshua D. Drake




-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-12-01 19:28:11
Subject: Re: enable-thread-safety defaults?
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-12-01 19:26:46
Subject: Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group