"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> It's supposed be a whole heap faster - there is no polling involved...
I looked into this more. AFAICT, the scenario in which kqueue is
said to be faster involves watching a large number of file
descriptors simultaneously. Since libpq is only watching one
descriptor, I don't see the benefit of adopting kqueue ...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
| Next: | From: Bruce Momjian | Date: 2003-03-06 04:33:36 |
| Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ /configure /configure.in rc/incl ... |
| Previous: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2003-03-06 03:47:51 |
| Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ /configure /configure.in rc/incl ... |
pgsql-committers by date
| Next: | From: Bruce Momjian | Date: 2003-03-06 04:33:36 |
| Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ /configure /configure.in rc/incl ... |
| Previous: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2003-03-06 03:47:51 |
| Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ /configure /configure.in rc/incl ... |