Re: Hot standby, recovery infrastructure

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery infrastructure
Date: 2009-01-27 17:48:56
Message-ID: 1233078536.2327.2251.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 17:50 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> > Just think standard-online-checkpoint and it all fits.
>
> Exactly that made me wonder why the first checkpoint needs to be any
> different.

Not really following you to be honest, assuming this was a separate
point to the other part of the mail.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-01-27 17:50:51 Re: gin fast insert performance
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-01-27 17:45:35 Re: Hot standby, recovery infrastructure