From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Koichi Suzuki <koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Proposal of PITR performance improvement for 8.4. |
Date: | 2008-10-28 15:26:27 |
Message-ID: | 1225207587.3971.183.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 12:34 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>
> > I'm happy with the idea of a readahead process. I thought we were
> > implementing a BackgroundReader process for other uses. Is that dead
> > now?
>
> You and Bruce seem to keep resurrecting that idea.
Actually just asking for status, not trying to change design.
> I've never liked it -- I
> always hated that in Oracle and thought it was a terrible kludge.
But now... If you have a better way, great, but that doesn't make
perfectly workable and fairly simple userspace solutions into kludges.
That's just an emotive description of your preference.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | postgres Emanuel CALVO FRANCO | 2008-10-28 15:33:10 | FAQ_Solaris 1.28 to spanish |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-10-28 14:59:48 | Re: WIP patch: convert SQL-language functions to return tuplestores |