Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
Date: 2008-09-18 14:24:55
Message-ID: 1221747895.3913.2432.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 10:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 09:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Do we really need a checkpoint there at all?
> 
> > "Timelines only change at shutdown checkpoints".
> 
> Hmm.  I *think* that that is just a debugging crosscheck rather than a
> critical property.  But yeah, it would take some close investigation,
> which maybe isn't warranted if you have a less-invasive solution.

The important thing is that everybody uses the new timelineid.

AFAICS we actually write new timelineids into the WAL file if the
previous timelineid, so it can't be that risky.

Ignore v5 then and look for v6 on Monday. Hopefully the final one :-)

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-09-18 14:38:15
Subject: Re: Do we really need a 7.4.22 release now?
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-09-18 14:10:41
Subject: Re: Adding new flags to XLogRecord

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-09-18 14:59:19
Subject: Re: Subtransaction commits and Hot Standby
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-09-18 14:09:43
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group