Re: [patch] plproxy v2

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] plproxy v2
Date: 2008-07-08 16:11:40
Message-ID: 1215533500.4051.946.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 08:58 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 18:43 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > On 7/8/08, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > > First let me say that I too enjoy PL/Proxy quite a bit. However, I don't
> > > think it needs to be in core. I wouldn't mind seeing it in contrib (or
> > > better yet modules/ should we ever get around to that).
> >
> > I'm not against contrib/ considering that the docs are now nicely
> > integrated, but then, whats the difference between src/pl/ and contrib/?
> >
>
> I am actually against adding to the grammar

Why?

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2008-07-08 16:13:10 Re: [patch] plproxy v2
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2008-07-08 16:10:45 Re: [PATCHES] Extending grant insert on tables to sequences