On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 12:01 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:31:16 +0100
> "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de> wrote:
> > Yes, i was asked more than once by ppl using a Google talk account.
> > Would be nice to have them added without adding another account in
> > pidgin.
> Apparently I have more work to do than anyone else :P. I have zero
> desire to have people contacting me from gmail, yahoo or other such
> thing. I am busy enough.
> The purpose of the jabber server was to allow contributors direct
> access to each other. If we open it up, that has the potential for even
> more communication overload.
> If we really want a public jabber server we can do that but I would
> like it to be separate from the internal jabber.postgresql server. We
> could then setup the public jabber server so that it can communicate
> with the private jabber server.
If people want the public chat, why don't they just use gtalk or
whatever public service they prefer?
I don't see a reason for us to run one private and one public server. In
fact, I don't see a reason for us to run a public one at all - if we
were running that, we could just as well run nothing.
AFAIK every reasonable IM client people would use today can easily add
two jabber accounts (or more), so I don't see the problem, really.
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2008-03-26 10:50:31|
|Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.3.1, 8.2.7 Update Release|
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2008-03-26 05:47:03|
|Subject: Re: New email list for emergency communications|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Gurjeet Singh||Date: 2008-03-26 11:43:50|
|Subject: Re: Problem with site doc search|
|Previous:||From: Gregory Stark||Date: 2008-03-26 09:23:06|
|Subject: Re: advancing snapshot's xmin|