Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

AW: Proposed WAL changes

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: AW: Proposed WAL changes
Date: 2001-03-06 16:09:30
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368227@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> >> Remove archdir from pg_control; it ought to be a GUC
> >> parameter, not a special case (not that it's implemented 
> yet anyway).
> 
> > Is archdir really a GUC parameter ?
> 
> Why shouldn't it be?  I see nothing wrong with changing it on-the-fly.

Yes, I think this is a good change, like all others except XID assignment :-)

Andreas

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-03-06 16:17:56
Subject: Re: AW: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure
Previous:From: Zeugswetter Andreas SBDate: 2001-03-06 16:05:22
Subject: AW: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group