AW: Proposed WAL changes

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: AW: Proposed WAL changes
Date: 2001-03-06 16:09:30
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368227@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> >> Remove archdir from pg_control; it ought to be a GUC
> >> parameter, not a special case (not that it's implemented
> yet anyway).
>
> > Is archdir really a GUC parameter ?
>
> Why shouldn't it be? I see nothing wrong with changing it on-the-fly.

Yes, I think this is a good change, like all others except XID assignment :-)

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-06 16:17:56 Re: AW: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2001-03-06 16:05:22 AW: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure