> >> Remove archdir from pg_control; it ought to be a GUC
> >> parameter, not a special case (not that it's implemented 
> yet anyway).
> 
> > Is archdir really a GUC parameter ?
> 
> Why shouldn't it be?  I see nothing wrong with changing it on-the-fly.

Yes, I think this is a good change, like all others except XID assignment :-)

Andreas

Responses

• RE: Proposed WAL changes at 2001-03-07 04:38:42 from Hiroshi Inoue

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2001-03-06 16:17:56
	Subject: Re: AW: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure
Previous:	From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB	Date: 2001-03-06 16:05:22
	Subject: AW: AW: WAL-based allocation of XIDs is insecure