Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

AW: Final proposal for resolving C-vs-newC issue

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: AW: Final proposal for resolving C-vs-newC issue
Date: 2000-11-27 11:51:08
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368143@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > At 17:16 19/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/fmgr/README
> 

Yes, this is now an imho very much improved way to go :-)

I would probably have used the "parameter style" extension to create function,
but that is imho not an important issue.

Thanks especially for the "standard C function" handler.

Andreas

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jarmo PaavilainenDate: 2000-11-27 12:24:06
Subject: SV: OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...
Previous:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2000-11-27 11:21:57
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic objects?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group