On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 12:49 -0500, Josh Harrison wrote:
> On Dec 27, 2007 12:37 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 10:49:10AM -0500, Josh Harrison wrote:
> > Hi,
> > We are trying to use slony and WAL shipping for warm standby
> for replication
> It's unusual to use both. Any reason you want to?
> We wanted to have 1 master and 1 slave that can be queried and 1 warm
> standby server that can be brought up in case of crash. So I thought
> it might be better to have WAL shipping for warm standby since thats
> working pretty good and Slony for master-slave replication.
> Let me know your comments on this setup? What is better for this
That's a setup I've recommended in the past.
It's like using RAC and Data Guard together, which is also common.
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2007-12-27 20:27:30|
|Subject: Re: weird date/times in mailing list|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Sullivan||Date: 2007-12-27 18:09:47|
|Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Any big slony and WAL shipping users?|