Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_fieldDESCLIMIT 1

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_fieldDESCLIMIT 1
Date: 2007-10-28 17:27:24
Message-ID: 1193592444.4242.711.camel@ebony.site (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 12:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I agree its annoying and I have a way of doing this, but that's an 8.4
> > thing now.
> 
> It was an 8.4 thing quite some time ago, since no working patch was ever
> submitted.

Sorry, I meant that the problem itself is annoying, not anything to do
with patches. I'm very happy with all that we've done.

-- 
  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2007-10-28 18:22:04
Subject: Re: Append Cost in query planners
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-10-28 16:53:59
Subject: Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group