Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Mario Weilguni" <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
Date: 2007-07-25 14:09:09
Message-ID: 1185372549.4146.33.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance

On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:07 +0200, Mario Weilguni wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 25 Juli 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> > I have reasonable evidence that Referential Integrity is the major
> > performance bottleneck and would like some objective evidence that this
> > is the case.
>
> Just curious, will 8.3 still check FK constraints (and use locks) even if the
> referencing column value does not change?

That is optimised away in 8.0+

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2007-07-25 14:09:50 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
Previous Message Dave Page 2007-07-25 14:02:00 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2007-07-25 14:09:50 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
Previous Message Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers 2007-07-25 13:35:12 Re: index over timestamp not being used