On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:08 +0200, Jacob Rief wrote:
> If there is any chance to get this patch applied, I will of course regenerate
> it out of the HEAD-revision of the CVS repository.
I don't see a reason to reject the patch. All the arguments about why
using C++ in the backend is ill-advised are well-taken, but the patch
does *not* require "making a real commitment to making C++ usable as a
backend extension language", it just obviates the need for some people
to patch the source. So +1 from me.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2007-06-29 20:31:29|
|Subject: Checkpoint logging, revised patch|
|Previous:||From: Susanne Ebrecht||Date: 2007-06-29 18:32:44|
|Subject: Re: rename of a view|