Re: Attempt to re-archive existing WAL logs afterrestoring from backup

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Jon Colverson" <pgsql(at)vcxz(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Attempt to re-archive existing WAL logs afterrestoring from backup
Date: 2007-06-01 11:02:34
Message-ID: 1180695755.26297.101.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 16:09 +0100, Jon Colverson wrote:
> >
> >> This looks like a bug to me. Any thoughts?
> >

> No; nothing is touching the archive except for the archive_command being
> run by PostgreSQL.

Jon,

You're still troubled by what you've seen?

Can you start from the beginning again and describe exactly what set of
circumstances you're in. I want to remove any bug or doubt that there is
one lurking.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hyatt, Gordon 2007-06-01 14:38:17 Failed install of PostgreSQL v8.2.4 - initdb fails with Access is denied
Previous Message Nico Franken 2007-06-01 09:11:14 config apache server

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-06-01 11:16:16 Re: [HACKERS] like/ilike improvements
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-06-01 08:57:16 Re: Postmaster startup messages