On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 16:09 +0100, Jon Colverson wrote:
> > 
> >> This looks like a bug to me. Any thoughts?
> > 

> No; nothing is touching the archive except for the archive_command being 
> run by PostgreSQL.

Jon,

You're still troubled by what you've seen?

Can you start from the beginning again and describe exactly what set of
circumstances you're in. I want to remove any bug or doubt that there is
one lurking.

-- 
  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

• Re: Attempt to re-archive existing WAL logs after restoring from backup at 2007-05-31 15:09:53 from Jon Colverson

Responses

• Re: Attempt to re-archive existing WAL logs afterrestoringfrom backup at 2007-06-01 20:02:19 from Simon Riggs

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2007-06-01 11:16:16
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] like/ilike improvements
Previous:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2007-06-01 08:57:16
	Subject: Re: Postmaster startup messages

pgsql-admin by date

Next:	From: Hyatt, Gordon	Date: 2007-06-01 14:38:17
	Subject: Failed install of PostgreSQL v8.2.4 - initdb fails with Access is denied
Previous:	From: Nico Franken	Date: 2007-06-01 09:11:14
	Subject: config apache server