Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: log_autovacuum

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: log_autovacuum
Date: 2007-04-17 19:01:57
Message-ID: 1176836518.3635.440.camel@silverbirch.site (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patchespgsql-www
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 14:45 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 14:06 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
> > > I've tinkered with this patch a bit.  Sample output:
> > > 
> > > LOG:  automatic vacuum of table "alvherre.public.foo": index scans: 0
> > >         pages: removed 0, 11226 remain
> > >         tuples: 1300683 removed, 1096236 remain
> > >         system usage: CPU 0.29s/0.38u sec elapsed 2.56 sec
> > > 
> > > Please comment.
> > 
> > Well, 'tis great except when you have very very frequent autovacuums.
> > That was why I wanted it in 1 log line.
> > 
> > Perhaps we need this as an integer, so we can log all vacuums that last
> > for longer in seconds than the setting, 0 logs all. That would
> > significantly reduce the volume if we set it to 5, say. That way you
> > would get your readability and I would get my reasonable size logs.
> 
> It kinda smells funny to have a setting like that.  Do we have a
> precedent?  If other people is OK with it, I'll do that.

log_temp_files works a bit like that, as does log_min_duration_statement

perhaps log_min_duration_vacuum?
that would be easier to understand

> Would it work to add a separate GUC var to control the minimum autovac
> time?  Also, why do it by time and not by amount of tuples/pages
> removed?

...because you only want to know about slow vacuums.

Time is a more natural unit than tuples removed.

-- 
  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Bill MoranDate: 2007-04-17 19:10:04
Subject: Re: log_autovacuum
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-17 18:59:16
Subject: Re: log_autovacuum

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-17 19:04:57
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] choose_bitmap_and again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strangely Variable Query Performance)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-17 18:59:16
Subject: Re: log_autovacuum

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group