Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Lock compatibility matrix

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Lock compatibility matrix
Date: 2007-01-30 20:45:00
Message-ID: 1170189900.3681.238.camel@silverbirch.site (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 21:33 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > Why would we want to have two redundant copies of the same
> > > information?
> >
> > The lock information is not available anywhere in the form of a
> > matrix.
> 
> But it will be.  A patch for the documentation has been proposed.

Cool. When that's done, we probably don't need the code version.

Would've been helpful if you'd explained what you meant... not many
people read all posts on all lists.

-- 
  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-30 22:50:26
Subject: Re: BUG #2913: Subscript on multidimensional array yields no value
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-01-30 20:33:26
Subject: Re: Lock compatibility matrix

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group