Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Lock compatibility matrix

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Lock compatibility matrix
Date: 2007-01-30 20:17:15
Message-ID: 1170188236.3681.226.camel@silverbirch.site (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 11:09 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> > I had this in a different form, but reworked so that it matches the
> > doc patch that Teodor submitted earlier. I think it would be good to
> > have this information in the lock.h file as well.
> 
> Why would we want to have two redundant copies of the same information?

The lock information is not available anywhere in the form of a matrix.

I've personally found a matrix useful for application design, though
that hasn't influenced Pavan's independent creation of exactly that.

-- 
  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-30 20:31:37
Subject: Re: Lock compatibility matrix
Previous:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2007-01-30 20:14:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump pretty_print

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group