Re: 8.3 pending patch queue

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.3 pending patch queue
Date: 2007-01-04 14:43:18
Message-ID: 1167921798.20749.111.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 09:09 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list
> > and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists?
> >
>
> AIUI, the hold list is those patches providing new features that were
> held over between 8.2 feature freeze and 8.2 branch. Since they have
> been around for a while I think they have some claim to priority. The
> other list is just the normal running list of such patches that Bruce keeps.

OK. Makes sense, thanks.

> > There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show
> > up on either list.

Hopefully the priority applies to all things that should be on the list.

> That also happens. The only way I can see of ensuring it does not happen
> would be to auto-process all patch submissions.

Sounds a good idea. Patch farm anyone? Auto apply/make check?

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-04 14:56:18 Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-01-04 14:34:42 Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files