Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.3 pending patch queue

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>,"PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.3 pending patch queue
Date: 2007-01-04 14:43:18
Message-ID: 1167921798.20749.111.camel@silverbirch.site (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 09:09 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list
> > and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists?
> >   
> 
> AIUI, the hold list is those patches providing new features that were 
> held over between 8.2 feature freeze and 8.2 branch. Since they have 
> been around for a while I think they have some claim to priority. The 
> other list is just the normal running list of such patches that Bruce keeps.

OK. Makes sense, thanks.

> > There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show
> > up on either list. 

Hopefully the priority applies to all things that should be on the list.

> That also happens. The only way I can see of ensuring it does not happen 
> would be to auto-process all patch submissions.

Sounds a good idea. Patch farm anyone? Auto apply/make check?

-- 
  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-04 14:56:18
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-01-04 14:34:42
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group