On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 09:09 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list
> > and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists?
> AIUI, the hold list is those patches providing new features that were
> held over between 8.2 feature freeze and 8.2 branch. Since they have
> been around for a while I think they have some claim to priority. The
> other list is just the normal running list of such patches that Bruce keeps.
OK. Makes sense, thanks.
> > There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show
> > up on either list.
Hopefully the priority applies to all things that should be on the list.
> That also happens. The only way I can see of ensuring it does not happen
> would be to auto-process all patch submissions.
Sounds a good idea. Patch farm anyone? Auto apply/make check?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-01-04 14:56:18|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files |
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2007-01-04 14:34:42|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files|