Re: Switching to XML

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Blewett <david(at)dawninglight(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Switching to XML
Date: 2006-12-10 16:51:24
Message-ID: 1165769484.13210.35.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 17:37 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I'm not stonewalling anything. If someone wants to prepare a case for
> moving to XML, be my guest. I'm just here to debunk the reasons for
> moving to XML which are wrong.
>

O.k. how about this:

We want to move to XML. We have community members that want to move to
XML. We have regional projects that want to move to XML.

You can not debunk any of those reasons.

The fact is, they want to.

Until you can come up with a reason why we *shouldn't* move to XML. I
believe this issue is settled.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-10 16:52:23 Re: Switching to XML
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-10 16:49:41 Re: Switching to XML