Re: Dynamic Tracing docs

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Robert Lor" <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dynamic Tracing docs
Date: 2006-12-02 12:50:08
Message-ID: 1165063809.3778.987.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 09:43 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Enclose new trace.sgml file as discussed on -docs.
>
> I have a question here, regarding this:
>
> To include DTrace support in a 64-bit binary, specify --enable-dtrace
> and DTRACEFLAGS="-64" to configure.
>
> The dtrace documentation says that dtrace automatically picks the right
> build environment. Something is wrong here. Either the dtrace
> documentation or ours.

I didn't presume to question Robert's technical notes
http://blogs.sun.com/robertlor/entry/user_level_dtrace_probes_in

Robert, Can you throw any light on this? Or do you have any further
comments on the docs?
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/dynamic-trace.html

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-12-02 13:31:32 Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-12-02 09:00:07 Open Season on v8.3 ...

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2006-12-02 19:38:46 Re: GUC description cleanup
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-12-02 08:43:36 Re: Dynamic Tracing docs