Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: bug message not CC'ing poster

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug message not CC'ing poster
Date: 2004-03-18 19:12:37
Message-ID: 11344.1079637157@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Dunno, delay was never a problem with the old implementation.  I think
>> Marc may have some special case in place in the mail list software
>> to allow bug-form reports to pass through.  Marc?

> Actually, I'd have to open up the list completely to any postings ... the
> only thing I can really base things off of us the From address ...

I looked back and found that my recollection was wrong.  The old bug
form generated this:

To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
From: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Reply-To: <submitter>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org

so I guess reply-to is what it'll have to be.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-03-18 19:14:58
Subject: Re: postgresql.mp3
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-03-18 19:04:44
Subject: Re: postgresql.mp3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group