Re: Documentation typos

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation typos
Date: 2005-10-13 07:15:20
Message-ID: 1129187720.8718.79.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 00:39 -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> *** doc/src/sgml/cvs.sgml 11 Aug 2005 13:52:33 -0000 1.34
> --- doc/src/sgml/cvs.sgml 13 Oct 2005 06:15:38 -0000
> ***************
> *** 849,855 ****
> to you the malloc code and an additional installation e-mail from
> John.
>
> The Modula-3 installation takes a good bit of room (~50MB?) and the
> ! build environment is unique to Modula-3, but suprisingly enough it
> pretty much works.
>
> The cvsup Makefiles do not work on my machine (they are not portable
> --- 849,855 ----
> to you the malloc code and an additional installation e-mail from
> John.
>
> The Modula-3 installation takes a good bit of room (~50MB?) and the
> ! build environment is unique to Modula-3, but surprisingly enough it
> pretty much works.
>
> The cvsup Makefiles do not work on my machine (they are not
> portable

This change modifies an SGML comment that contains the text of an email
thread, so it is debatable whether we should be modifying it. However,
is there a good reason for this comment to be in cvs.sgml to begin with?

I agree we should pick American or British spelling and use one
consistently. Barring any objections, I'll apply the rest of the patch
within a day or two.

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Wegrzyn 2005-10-13 13:24:27 BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-10-13 06:39:17 Documentation typos