From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: VACUUM/t_ctid bug (was Re: GiST concurrency commited) |
Date: | 2005-08-24 15:41:20 |
Message-ID: | 1124898080.4827.13.camel@fuji.krosing.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On K, 2005-08-24 at 15:52 +0400, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> > Further I'm going to increase concurrency up to 12 parallel threads.
>
> All is ok, test is passed with approximatly 40 millions statements
>
I have sent a patch to patches list enabling concurrent vacuums to
actually reclaim space while another long vacuum is running, i.e.
vacuums won't no longer block each other from removing deleted tuples.
see:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-08/msg00304.php
Could you perhaps test this patch as well, while you already have a
setup for testing parallel vacuums under big loads ?
Or perhaps you can share the setup/scripts/data so that I could run your
test myself as well ?
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-24 15:59:08 | Re: FW: Win32 unicode vs ICU |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-24 14:47:19 | Re: TODO questions |