Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ...

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ...
Date: 2005-06-01 01:55:23
Message-ID: 1117590923.6678.66.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 09:30 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> This whole GiST concurrency think really needs to be looked at :(

I spent some time looking at it toward the end of last year, but
unfortunately I didn't have enough time to devote to it to get a working
implementation (it is quite a lot of work). I'm still interesting in
working on it, although I won't have any time until after 8.1.

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2005-06-01 02:03:09 Re: audit facilities?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-06-01 01:44:28 Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ...