On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 09:25, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 3. März 2005 16:05 schrieb Kelly Burkhart:
> > I'm attaching a patch which fixes this, and some other questionable
> > sprintf format strings in convert.c.
> Do we have any evidence that the other ones are broken?
No, I do not.
I suggested that the other format strings were questionable based on a
reading of the glibc printf man page. Aside from the 32-bit integer
problem the other formats work fine in the unmodified form on the three
platforms I use.
Can anyone with a better understanding of the libc standard comment on
the "correctness" of the following lines?
In response to
pgsql-odbc by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-03-21 19:46:29|
|Subject: Re: 32-bit ints on 64-bit linux |
|Previous:||From: Philippe Lang||Date: 2005-03-21 07:30:26|
|Subject: Command Prompt Commercial ODBC driver?|