Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1
Date: 2004-10-01 00:53:56
Message-ID: 1096592036.25277.432.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 19:28, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 05:52, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I don't think we can do that in a standard function, at least not
> > without a lot of work.
>
> Can you elaborate on why this would be so difficult?

I never got a reply to this question -- someone, anyone?

(BTW, Gavin and I are working through the suggestions for changes to the
stored procedure proposal -- we'll send a revised spec to the list next
week. Thanks for the feedback, everyone.)

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-01 00:55:20 Re: AIX and V8 beta 3
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2004-10-01 00:27:26 Re: Reviving Time Travel (was Re: 'TID index')