Re: IBM/DB2 PostgreSQL FUD?

From: Tom Copeland <tom(at)infoether(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IBM/DB2 PostgreSQL FUD?
Date: 2004-07-13 13:31:46
Message-ID: 1089725506.24822.26.camel@hal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 08:36, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> It would be nice to see some uptime statistics from him IMO. Not really
> useful in a modern sense because it predates WAL, but it least to
> contrast what IBM is talking about...

Since Tim went on to build GForge on top of PostgreSQL, I daresay he's a
big fan. PostgreSQL is now powering all these sites:

http://gforge.org/docman/view.php/1/52/gforge-sites.html

Good times!

Tom Copeland
tom(at)infoether(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2004-07-13 14:31:40 Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-07-13 13:16:33 Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant