Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: IBM/DB2 PostgreSQL FUD?

From: Tom Copeland <tom(at)infoether(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IBM/DB2 PostgreSQL FUD?
Date: 2004-07-13 13:31:46
Message-ID: 1089725506.24822.26.camel@hal (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 08:36, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> It would be nice to see some uptime statistics from him IMO.  Not really
> useful in a modern sense because it predates WAL, but it least to
> contrast what IBM is talking about...

Since Tim went on to build GForge on top of PostgreSQL, I daresay he's a
big fan.  PostgreSQL is now powering all these sites:

http://gforge.org/docman/view.php/1/52/gforge-sites.html

Good times!

Tom Copeland
tom(at)infoether(dot)com

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Lamar OwenDate: 2004-07-13 14:31:40
Subject: Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-07-13 13:16:33
Subject: Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group