Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning
Date: 2004-04-27 20:56:26
Message-ID: 1083099385.30065.87.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Overall, I'd refer back to the points Bruce raised - you certainly do
> need a way of finding out the time to recover to, and as others have
> said also, time isn't the only desirable "recovery point".

Wouldn't it be sufficient to simply use the transaction ID and ensure
that all the parameters the user might want to use to find that ID can
be made available in the log files?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2004-04-27 20:56:59 Re: What can we learn from MySQL?
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2004-04-27 20:52:03 Re: Is there any method to keep table in memory at startup