Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Cott Lang <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-27 03:57:46
Message-ID: 1077854266.4360.5.camel@blackbox
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www

On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 13:41, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Perhaps when BZ supports PG - some progress is being made on that front,
> but it's not a done deal yet.

Redhat puts out a PG version of Bugzilla. It works pretty well.

However, we just dropped it in favor of Jira.

Jira is a lot friendlier for the less technically adept, and IIRC, it's
free for open source projects. It's not enough to have something that
can track bugs; you have to have something that people are willing to
use. :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cott Lang 2004-02-27 04:01:41 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2004-02-27 03:56:11 Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cott Lang 2004-02-27 04:01:41 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-02-27 02:08:32 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cott Lang 2004-02-27 04:01:41 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-02-27 02:08:32 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cott Lang 2004-02-27 04:01:41 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-02-27 02:08:32 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal