Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Cott Lang <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-27 03:57:46
Message-ID: 1077854266.4360.5.camel@blackbox (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-www
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 13:41, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Perhaps when BZ supports PG - some progress is being made on that front, 
> but it's not a done deal yet.

Redhat puts out a PG version of Bugzilla. It works pretty well.

However, we just dropped it in favor of Jira. 

Jira is a lot friendlier for the less technically adept, and IIRC, it's
free for open source projects. It's not enough to have something that
can track bugs; you have to have something that people are willing to
use. :)






In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Cott LangDate: 2004-02-27 04:01:41
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2004-02-27 02:08:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Cott LangDate: 2004-02-27 04:01:41
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2004-02-27 03:56:11
Subject: Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Cott LangDate: 2004-02-27 04:01:41
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2004-02-27 02:08:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Cott LangDate: 2004-02-27 04:01:41
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2004-02-27 02:08:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group