From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu |
Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the |
Date: | 2003-11-18 21:28:31 |
Message-ID: | 1069190911.10335.7677.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
http://www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs186/hwk0/index.html
Are these screenshots of PgAccess on Mac OSX?
Robert Treat
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 13:07, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
>
> PostgreSQL most definitely works great on Solaris x86 !
>
> At UC Berkeley, we have our undergraduate students hack on the
> internals of PostgreSQL in the upper-division "Introduction to
> Database Systems" class ..
>
> http://www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs186/
>
> The "official" platform is Solaris x86 - that's where the students get
> accounts and they have to get their code working on that platform as
> the TAs will only test and grade their submissions on Solaris x86.
>
> (Besides, I also got TelegraphCQ running on Solaris x86 .. just for
> kicks though .. and TelegraphCQ is based off of pgsql-7.3.2)
>
> --
> Pip-pip
> Sailesh
> http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2003-11-18 21:50:00 | Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-11-18 20:48:53 | PgManage now Open Source |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2003-11-18 21:50:00 | Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-11-18 20:26:38 | Re: Sponsoring enterprise features |