Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Tech Docs and Consultants

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, elein(at)varlena(dot)com,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Date: 2003-04-14 12:44:35
Message-ID: 1050324276.9816.13.camel@camel (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 23:38, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > However, I can only reasonably manage Techdocs if it's on a production-ready
> > Content Management System, with simplified page editing, multi-user rights
> > management, and revision history.   I have investigated this extensively, and
> > there are *no* production-ready, pure OSS, CMS for PostgreSQL running on PHP
> > or Perl.  I was looking at developing one with Andy Chase (based on his
> > "SnapSnap"), but then he got a job and Zapatec announced the launch of Bloki.
> 
> What's wrong with Bricolage?
> 
> Chris
> 

Actually I'm still waiting to here what was wrong with the current plan
to move the site to the zope/wiki engine...

Robert Treat


In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: justinDate: 2003-04-14 13:44:22
Subject: Fwd: A within the next day or two request for a PostgreSQL contact from advocacy.postgresql.org
Previous:From: Justin CliftDate: 2003-04-14 11:13:10
Subject: Re: Tech Docs and Consultants

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group