I think the mail server was busted over the last couple of days
(Thursday till Sunday afternoon).
Read archives of -hackers, you'll see there were a few conversations
going on that were never actually distributed.
Anyway, nothing wrong with re-posting them.
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 02:06, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> I have sent in a few patches in the last couple of days (and resent) and
> they haven't appeared on the lists - what's going on?
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2003-03-03 14:46:17|
|Subject: Testing ... ignore ...|
|Previous:||From: Tommi Maekitalo||Date: 2003-03-03 13:53:50|
|Subject: Re: Yet another open-source benchmark|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-03-03 14:32:43|
|Subject: Re: psql patch for datestyle |
|Previous:||From: Matthew T. O'Connor||Date: 2003-03-03 07:09:32|
|Subject: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2)|
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Sebastiano Cascione||Date: 2003-03-03 14:20:29|
|Subject: pg_dump version|
|Previous:||From: Oleg Samoylov||Date: 2003-03-03 13:50:10|
|Subject: Re: transparent use of pre-aggregated value for very large datasets|