I think the mail server was busted over the last couple of days
(Thursday till Sunday afternoon).

Read archives of -hackers, you'll see there were a few conversations
going on that were never actually distributed.

Anyway, nothing wrong with re-posting them.


On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 02:06, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have sent in a few patches in the last couple of days (and resent) and
> they haven't appeared on the lists - what's going on?
> 
> Chris
-- 
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

In response to

• Off topic - was Re: ALTER SEQUENCE at 2003-03-03 07:06:02 from Christopher Kings-Lynne

Responses

• Re: Off topic - was Re: [PATCHES] ALTER SEQUENCE at 2003-03-03 14:52:14 from Marc G. Fournier

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Marc G. Fournier	Date: 2003-03-03 14:46:17
	Subject: Testing ... ignore ...
Previous:	From: Tommi Maekitalo	Date: 2003-03-03 13:53:50
	Subject: Re: Yet another open-source benchmark

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2003-03-03 14:32:43
	Subject: Re: psql patch for datestyle
Previous:	From: Matthew T. O'Connor	Date: 2003-03-03 07:09:32
	Subject: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2)

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Sebastiano Cascione	Date: 2003-03-03 14:20:29
	Subject: pg_dump version
Previous:	From: Oleg Samoylov	Date: 2003-03-03 13:50:10
	Subject: Re: transparent use of pre-aggregated value for very large datasets