Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date: 2010-01-29 20:28:35
Message-ID: 10281.1264796915@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> With the release of Postgres 9.0, should we consider changing the
> default for 'standard_conforming_strings'?

I'm inclined to think we're going to have enough problems without that.
Changing that default will break, approximately speaking, every single
Postgres client app.  Do you really think more than epsilon of them
are clean and ready for such a change?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-29 20:42:20
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-01-29 20:25:46
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Augment WAL records for btree delete with GetOldestXmin() to

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group