Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
Date: 2008-01-31 17:58:42
Message-ID: 10277.1201802322@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>>> Furthermore HP is hardly the authoritative reference on SSL. Can't
>>> we find an RFC or something?
>>
>> See above.

> If anything, we should link to OpenSSL, because they implement the API we are
> referring to. I don't know what HP has to do with it.

Yeah, I was thinking a simple pointer to www.openssl.org would be more
appropriate. We're not here to substitute for somebody doing their
own Google search ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-31 18:04:59 Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-01-31 17:50:04 Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library