Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Vacuum and Transactions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Trewern, Ben" <Ben(dot)Trewern(at)mowlem(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum and Transactions
Date: 2001-07-06 16:02:04
Message-ID: 10162.994435324@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
In 7.2, VACUUM will not require an exclusive lock.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-07-06 16:10:37
Subject: Re: FE/BE protocol oddity
Previous:From: Mikheev, VadimDate: 2001-07-06 15:54:27
Subject: RE: AW: AW: Re: Backup and Recovery

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Ian HardingDate: 2001-07-06 16:04:34
Subject: Re: pgsql and sql-relay
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-07-06 15:45:17
Subject: Re: Vacuum and Transactions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group