On Oct 21, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> The oversight here is that we don't use appendrel planning for
> a top-level UNION ALL construct. That didn't use to matter,
> because you always got the same stupid Append plan either way.
> Now it seems like we ought to have some more intelligence for the
> top-level SetOp case. I smell some code refactoring coming up.
Does it smell like chicken?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-10-21 22:30:52|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_filedump binary for CentOS|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-10-21 21:46:50|
|Subject: Re: Why do we have a database specification in