Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal

From: "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Date: 2001-06-12 02:32:14
Message-ID: 069c01c0f2e7$e47eb450$0205a8c0@jecw2k1 (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
>
> I don't know about other people but the 48 hours notice email and the
> web page of outstanding patches seems to be working well for me.
>

Sorry -- my "into the ether" comment wasn't griping about you :-)

I've been having serious problems with my "mail.com" account. I originally
sent this post Saturday afternoon, but it didn't even make it to the
pgsql-patches list
until Monday morning (and I only know that because I started reading the
comp.databases.postgresql.patches news feed).
 :(

Joe




In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-06-12 02:34:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Previous:From: Chris DunlopDate: 2001-06-12 02:32:07
Subject: Re: Australian timezone configure option

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-06-12 02:34:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Previous:From: Chris DunlopDate: 2001-06-12 02:32:07
Subject: Re: Australian timezone configure option

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group