Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PERFORM] Index File growing big.

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Index File growing big.
Date: 2003-02-28 01:57:43
Message-ID: 05a901c2decc$c8a81af0$6500a8c0@fhp.internal (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Hi Jim,

Do you have a version of the patch that's synced against CVS HEAD?

Chris

> All,
>
> I was the person who submitted the patch.  I tried to a generic syntax.  I
also tried to keep the tablespace concept
> simple.  See my posting on HACKERS/GENERAL from a week or 2 ago about the
syntax.  I am still interested in working on
> this patch with others.  I have many system here that are 500+ gigabytes
and growing.  It is a real pain to add more
> disk space (I have to backup, drop database(s), rebuild raid set (I am
using raid 10) and reload data).
>
> Jim



In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Jeandre du ToitDate: 2003-02-28 11:03:49
Subject:
Previous:From: Ron MayerDate: 2003-02-28 01:51:13
Subject: Re: OIDs as keys

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-02-28 02:05:48
Subject: Re: analyze after a database restore?
Previous:From: Justin CliftDate: 2003-02-27 23:46:56
Subject: Re: analyze after a database restore?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group