Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bricolage: Impressive

From: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>,Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net>,PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive
Date: 2004-01-20 06:29:37
Message-ID: 04EE9700-4B12-11D8-8158-000A95972D84@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
On Jan 19, 2004, at 12:44 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> k, seperate VM isn't an issue ... but what is it doing that it needs 
> its
> own machine?  God, I thought Java programs were the worst, you are 
> saying
> that this needs more then jakarta-tomcat processes?
>
> David?

It typically starts up using around 25MB per process (shared). It's not 
uncommon for processes to swell upwards of 50MB or more. Then there are 
the PostgreSQL processes.

Hey, you want a lot of functionality, you got to pay for it.

Cheers,

David


In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: David WheelerDate: 2004-01-20 06:32:20
Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive
Previous:From: David WheelerDate: 2004-01-20 06:26:00
Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group