Just so I'm clear, does this mean that 9.0 provides a way for the JDBC driver authors to get the correct PK meta data so they can fix this problem in the 9.0 JDBC driver?
If so, it implies that the current and previous JDBC drivers will break with 9.0, which seems unfortunate... but I suppose it's better than not being able to work with 9.0 at all.
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 3:30 PM
To: Adam Rauch
Subject: Re: [TESTERS] [TEST REPORT] JDBC reports invalid primary key meta data after PK column rename
This is an intentional change in behavior. I've contacted the JDBC
driver authors about being ready for it in the new release of pgJDBC for
9.0. I'll contact other driver authors as well.
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
In response to
pgsql-testers by date
|Next:||From: Paul Anderson||Date: 2010-05-07 12:25:11|
|Subject: Possible 9.0 bug|
|Previous:||From: Mauro Medda||Date: 2010-05-05 07:49:35|
|Subject: [TEST REPORT] - Install test PostgreSQL 9.0beta1 from RedHat Enterprise