Re: Update on 'portal' changes

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update on 'portal' changes
Date: 2004-03-11 08:28:36
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F64F@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
> Sent: 10 March 2004 23:11
> To: Dave Page; borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su
> Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Update on 'portal' changes
>
> It frankly didn't occur to us that anyone would have an
> opinion about the
> name. Our goal was to get this up and running while
> everyone involved has
> time available to work on it.

Oh of course. For what it's worth I quite like pgFoundry...

> Stuff will drop out of the loop from time to time; I know
> that for my part once I've discussed something with one
> mailing list plus five individuals I
> tend to feel like I've covered everyone even if I haven't.
> Our community
> is getting a little too big for everyone to know about everything.

These things happen from time to time - that was the point I was trying
to make.

> The Bugtracker question has been shelved due to lack of
> consensus, BTW.
> Quite probably by the time we deal with it again the GForge
> bugtracker will be adequate for our requirements.

That good - I never liked Bugzilla which seemed to be favourite at one
point.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-03-11 08:30:35 Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project
Previous Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2004-03-11 07:28:44 Re: New News Entry