No connection to Server

From: Dennis Hübner <huebner(at)te-systems(dot)de>
To: "'pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: No connection to Server
Date: 2005-01-26 16:07:16
Message-ID: 0377D79F17A13441A87E977638D7CCA24F6E1B@home.te-systems.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


Name: Dennis Hübner
Email: huebner(at)te-systems(dot)de
<mailto:huebner(at)te-systems(dot)de>
PostgreSQL version: 8.0
Operation system: Windows XP Professional
Short description: No connection to Server


Hi there,

I have trouble with newer versions of postgresql.

On every version of postgresql the only thing I changed at the
'postgresql.conf' is 'max_connections = 500'.
Otherwise I used default installation.

I'm using a telephony-system with 30 lines and I generate calls to this
system.

Now the system looks into the postgres-database if the calling number is
present and after that receives the calls.

With every older postgres-version up to 8.0.0-rc3 (this is the last working
version) everything is all right.

The database-system checks for the user and gives back the results.
This works on all 30 lines parallel.

On newer versions (higher than rc3) the connections were refused or could
not be established by the server.

Every time I get one of these error messages:

- 'could not send SSL negotiation packet: The system cannot find the path
specified'

- 'server closed the connection unexpectedly. This probably means the server
terminated abnormally'

- 'error while processing sql-command'


I hope you can help me.


Kind regards,

Dennis Hübner

************************************************
TE-SYSTEMS GmbH - competence in e-communications
Max-von-Laue-Weg 19 fon +49 5361 895-120
38448 Wolfsburg fax +49 5361 895-999
http://www.te-systems.de <http://www.te-systems.de/>
huebner(at)te-systems(dot)de <mailto:huebner(at)te-systems(dot)de>

Visit also our website: www.xcapi.de <http://www.xcapi.de/>

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-01-26 19:04:49 Re: Inconsistent behavior with TIMESTAMP WITHOUT and epoch
Previous Message Andrew - Supernews 2005-01-26 14:54:41 Re: incorrect index behaviour with rtree on box values