Re: Bytea/Base64 encoders for libpq - interested?

From: "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Karel Zak" <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, "Joerg Hessdoerfer" <Joerg(dot)Hessdoerfer(at)sea-gmbh(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bytea/Base64 encoders for libpq - interested?
Date: 2001-09-04 23:09:17
Message-ID: 01d101c13596$9f404380$0705a8c0@jecw2k1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Why not just stick these things into encode() and name them
> > "my-cool-encoding" or whatever.
>
> Sounds good to me ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Sounds good to me too. Patch forthcoming . . .

-- Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-09-05 01:12:28 Log rotation?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-09-04 22:58:21 Re: Bytea/Base64 encoders for libpq - interested?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-09-05 03:50:51 Re: Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-09-04 22:58:21 Re: Bytea/Base64 encoders for libpq - interested?